What happened in Texas last week was reminiscent of comedy movies in which some innocent characters are mistaken for terrorists. Previously, especially during the Cold War years, this genre was mostly stories of naive characters mistaken for spies and the adventures of these accidental spies in hostile environments. However, in recent years there has been a transformation in this genre. Among these more recent movies, probably one that is talked about the most is a terrible one: “Harold and Kumar: Escape from Guantanamo Bay.” The movie is about the adventures of two young men after they face accusations of being terrorists while they are flying to Amsterdam. A series of events in the plane alarms some of the passengers and creates panic that leads to the arrest of the two men. In one of the oft quoted scenes of the movie, the officers from homeland security prepare to interrogate the two men and see that one of them looks different, the Korean character. Then a conversation starts between him and the officer taking care of the two men.
Officer: What’s up with the guy with the weird eyes? He handicapped or something?
-We believe he’s of Korean decent
-My God. North Korea and al-Qaida working together. This is bigger than I thought.
Although it sounds very much like an exaggeration of ignorance and stereotyping, the fact that now there is enough material about these misperceptions and mischaracterization to be an object of comedy has something to do with the changing threat perception and social dynamics in the U.S. following the 9/11 attacks. The vulnerability of the most securely protected buildings and institutions in the U.S. during these attacks raised a significant atmosphere of fear among Americans, which in turn generated a significant impact on the social relations and perceptions of Muslims in the country. Fourteen years after these terrible tragedies in New York and Washington, the depth of this trauma is still observable among some segments of society. When over a decade after this incident, during a Donald Trump political rally, the front runner in the Republican presidential primary at this point, someone among the audience said: “We have a problem in this country. It’s called Muslims. You know our current president is one. You know he’s not even an American.” It showed the depth of this trauma and the extent of discriminatory perceptions.
In part what contributed to this discourse on Muslims in the U.S. was the increasing normalization of discriminatory statements about Muslims in the political sphere. In the last few elections we saw presidential candidates arguing that they would officially implement profiling for Muslims and Middle Easterners and those who expressed a plan to ask any Muslim staff member he hires to take a loyalty oath. These debates and irresponsible statements made discriminatory statements more common in the public sphere.
AHMED MOHAMED’S CLOCK
Now to the Ahmed Mohamed case. Yes, it sounded like a comedy script. A 14-year-old boy in Texas was arrested last week for bringing his homemade alarm clock to school to show it to his engineering teacher. When the alarm clock started to make sounds in the classroom another teacher was worried about the device and subsequently the school called the police who escorted Mohamed out of the classroom. They took him to a room and did not allow him to call his parents during the initial interrogation. The primary accusation at this point was that it was a hoax bomb. The school suspended Mohamed for three days following the incident. But this bleak picture of what happened in a very short period of time received reactions from Americans who oppose such forms of discrimination in their country. Within a short period of time photographs of Mohamed, bewildered by what happened and handcuffed, went viral on social media. On different social media outlets the news and reactions about such a meaningless action started to be questioned and criticized. In a very short period of time #Istandwithahmed became