brics

A female press member talks on the phone within 10th BRICS Summit at Sandton Convention Centre in Johannesburg, South Africa on July 27, 2018. ( Halil Sağırkaya - Anadolu Agency )

BRICS need objective credit rating agency: Expert

Emerging powerhouses need objective institution against Western-based agencies' political decisions, says economic expert

By Gokhan Ergocun

ANKARA

As the BRICS emerging economy powerhouses have problems with Western credit rating agencies’ politically biased decisions, an objective agency is needed, a top Turkish analyst said on Friday.

“Building a new credit rating agency, which was considered by the international market, is difficult not only for Turkey but also for Russia, Brazil, or South Africa,” Nurullah Gur, economics director at the Foundation for Political, Economic and Social Research (SETA), based in Turkey’s capital Ankara, told Anadolu Agency.

He added: “Making a move with BRICS is sensible for Turkey. Five BRICS countries who stay the course of dominating the world economy will raise the credit rating agency’s reputation.”

At the 10th BRICS summit in Johannesburg, South Africa on Friday, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Turkey and the BRICS countries — Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa — can jointly establish a more objective credit rating agency.

Erdogan has complained that some established ratings agencies are biased against Turkey and ignore its true economic strength.

International or local 

A local agency can rate Turkey’s national companies but could fall short on financing big projects and attracting international investors, Gur cautioned.

He also said that working together in some developing countries and establishing an agency would be more productive in terms of objectivity.

“While a local agency could take a long time to gain a reputation — up to 50 years — an international agency can be reputable within 10 years,” he added.

BRICS countries previously planned to establish an agency, but they prioritized establishing a development bank, he said.

He added: “The development bank was founded, now they can take steps for a credit rating agency.”

Almost all influential agencies — Fitch, Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s — are located in Western countries, he underlined, adding:

“A new rating agency could weaken the Western-based agencies. G20 countries’ leaders also want to break the big three or four player’s hold on power in the credit rating market.”

Legal framework for agency 

In its medium-term program published last October, Turkey targeted establishing a local credit rating agency.

With Turkey’s record growth rate — 7.4 percent both in 2017 and the first quarter of 2018 — the rating agencies’ negative decisions on Turkey’s economy were slammed as biased by Turkish leaders.

Nihat Zeybekci, then-economy minister, said: “We do not find rating agencies’ assessments reasonable, they are speculative and manipulative.”

Mehmet Ali Akben, head of the Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency (BDDK), said Turkey has made regulations to allow the formation of an independent and local credit rating agency sometime in 2018.

“The new measure provides regulations for licensing credit rating agencies and their activities,” he stressed.

“Some regional and international rating agencies have requested information, and want to take part in the local agency,” he added.

[AA, 27 July 2018]

In this article